Requires better resource management, creating more strategic positions as well as strategies.
I'll need to play the newer Total wars before I can truly say which series is better. Aoe 3 had good chapters, but some of them were just silly).\r\nThe only fault in R:TW for me is all the crap you have to go through to upgrade units (for one damn city!!). But aoe still has a kickass story.(err, the historical stories up until aoe3. TRIARII!!! FORWARD MARCH!!!\r\n\r\n\r\nI've had more fun in Rome than in age of empires.\r\nI actually need to control my units in TW whereas in AoE it's just mass musketeers/artys and steamroll the base. The only fault in R:TW for me is all the crap you have to go through to upgrade units (for one damn city!!). Aoe 3 had good chapters, but some of them were just silly).
I actually need to control my units in TW whereas in AoE it's just mass musketeers/artys and steamroll the base. I've had more fun in Rome than in age of empires. it is also fun to add a city-building aspect to it, as well as the naval comat, which i've played on Empire, WHICH IS EPIC! \r\n\r\nbut that is from your strategy freak SirNoob, not sure what everyone else thinks =/ i am a micromanagement freak, and love to see my units progress as they march across my enemies home territory. it is also fun to add a city-building aspect to it, as well as the naval comat, which i've played on Empire, WHICH IS EPIC!īut that is from your strategy freak SirNoob, not sure what everyone else thinks =/ neh AoE was OK, but i didn't like it as much as the Total War games! i started out with their Rome series, p0wned it, got Medieval w/ expansions, p0wned that too, and am currently looking to buy the third one, Empire, and maybe Napoleon. Neh AoE was OK, but i didn't like it as much as the Total War games! i started out with their Rome series, p0wned it, got Medieval w/ expansions, p0wned that too, and am currently looking to buy the third one, Empire, and maybe Napoleon.
0 kommentar(er)
